There is something that happens when you offer food to a person who has not been offered it with kindness for a while. They do not simply receive nourishment. They receive acknowledgement. The two are not the same thing, and conflating them is a mistake that well-meaning people make often.
Nourishment is physical. Acknowledgement is human. A food distribution programme can provide the first without any of the second. A person can receive a meal without ever being looked at, spoken to, treated as though they are a full human being in possession of a life and a history and a name.
I have found that how you give matters as much as what you give. Perhaps more.
When I distribute meals, I try to be present in the actual sense — not just physically present, but attentive. I try to look at people. To speak to them. To take a moment, even a brief one, that acknowledges that we are two human beings in the same place rather than one person performing generosity at another.
I do not always succeed at this. The logistics of distribution, the number of people, the practical demands of the work — these things can pull you away from the human dimension if you are not careful. I try to be careful.
The long-term vision of the nourishment pillar — community kitchens, open-door spaces, places where anyone can eat — is built around this principle. Not just the food. The experience of receiving it with dignity. The experience of sitting somewhere and being welcomed rather than processed.
That is what I am trying to build toward. It is harder to measure than meals distributed. It matters more.
From the archive
Back to the Journal